Sacred Femininity: The Power of a Godly Woman

There is something powerful about a woman who knows who she is.

Not because she has learned how to dominate a room.

Not because she has become so independent that she no longer needs anyone.

Not because she has mastered the art of getting what she wants.

There is something far more mysterious happening.

Something we didn’t create.

Something we can’t manufacture.

Something that can’t be summoned by sheer will or explained away by human understanding.

Something God put there.

There is a depth to womanhood that we may spend our entire lives learning to recognize. A strength that is present before we have the language to describe it. A kind of sacred potential woven into us at creation—not something we have to invent, but something we must grow into.

And perhaps that is part of what becoming really means.

We learn.

We unlearn.

We discard the things we’ve been taught that were never true.

We separate God’s design from the world’s definitions.

And little by little, we begin to recognize what was there all along.

There is a God-given strength to womanhood.

And I think we’ve spent a long time either misunderstanding it, minimizing it, or handing the definition over to somebody else.

The world has its version of femininity.

The church has had its versions.

Social media has its versions.

And somewhere in the middle of all of that noise, a woman can begin to wonder:

What does it actually mean to be a woman?

Not what am I supposed to wear?

Not how am I supposed to behave?

Not how do I become desirable?

Not how do I keep everybody happy?

Not even, How do I become a “good Christian woman”?

But:

What did God actually put inside me when He made me female?

That’s a much bigger question.

And perhaps it’s time we asked it.


We Don’t Need to Become More Powerful

Women are constantly being told to become more powerful.

Be independent.

Be ambitious.

Be fearless.

Take up space.

Build the business.

Make the money.

Need no one.

And there is nothing inherently wrong with strength, ambition, accomplishment, or independence.

But somewhere along the way, we’ve quietly accepted the idea that the only recognizable form of power is the kind that looks like more.

More achievement.

More control.

More productivity.

More influence.

More independence.

More.

And yet many women who have spent years becoming “more” are exhausted.

Overstimulated.

Overcommitted.

Chronically available.

Disconnected from their own needs.

Disconnected from their bodies.

Disconnected from their families.

Disconnected from quiet.

Sometimes even disconnected from God.

We’re told we can have it all.

But perhaps we should also ask what “all” is costing us.

Because there is a strange irony in a culture that tells women they are powerful enough to do everything while simultaneously creating a generation of women who are too depleted to enjoy much of what they worked so hard to obtain.

Now, please understand. I’m not interested in unraveling every cultural contradiction in one article.

But I do think we need to stop looking to the world to tell us what a powerful woman looks like.

Because God created woman before culture ever had an opinion about her.

And perhaps we’ve been spending our strength in places that were never meant to have it.


Something Was Put Here— on Purpose

Go back to the beginning.

Before Proverbs 31.

Before marriage advice.

Before cultural expectations.

Before anyone had an opinion about what a woman should or shouldn’t be.

Go back to Genesis.

God created humanity.

Male and female.

Different.

Equal in worth.

Both bearing His image.

And the woman wasn’t an afterthought.

She wasn’t God’s second attempt at creating something useful.

She wasn’t simply a softer version of Adam.

She was created intentionally.

And when Scripture describes her as a helper corresponding to him, we should be careful not to import our modern understanding of the word helper into the text.

Because the Hebrew word ezer is not a word reserved for subordinate assistants.

Scripture uses it elsewhere to describe God Himself as a helper.

That’s worth pausing over.

Because perhaps we’ve been asking the wrong question.

Instead of:

“How can a woman help a man?”

Perhaps we should also be asking:

“What kind of strength did God intend woman to bring?”

A corresponding strength.

A strength that isn’t identical to his. (After all, why would he need MORE of what he already has??) 

A strength that doesn’t need to compete with his.

A strength that doesn’t need to become masculine to be legitimate.

Different is not diminished.

And that distinction matters enormously.


There Is a Feminine Strength

We use words like presence.

Energy.

Influence.

Atmosphere.

Intuition.

Creativity.

Warmth.

Strength.

Beauty.

Sometimes we use them without knowing exactly what we’re trying to describe.

You know the woman I’m talking about.

She walks into a room and something changes.

She may not be the loudest person there.

She may not command attention.

She may not even say much.

But there is something about her.

Something grounded.

Something alive.

Something that makes people feel safe.

Or makes them think.

Or makes them pay attention.

Or makes them want to become more honest.

We have given this phenomenon a lot of names.

And unfortunately, some of the language surrounding feminine “energy” has become tangled up with ideas that have very little to do with biblical truth.

So let’s be clear.

I’m not talking about manifestation.

I’m not talking about harnessing mystical forces to get what you want.

I’m not talking about discovering that you are divine.

The woman is not the source of her power. God is.

But that doesn’t mean there is nothing worth discussing.

Perhaps we’ve simply allowed the culture to put strange language around something God created first.

There is a particular expression of strength that belongs to womanhood.

There is receptivity.

Discernment.

Creativity.

Nurture.

Courage.

Relational intelligence.

Generativity.

Beauty.

Wisdom.

The capacity to receive something and bring forth something new.

The capacity to perceive what is happening beneath the surface.

The capacity to cultivate what has been entrusted to her.

The capacity to create an environment in which something—or someone—can flourish.

None of that is weakness.

And none of it requires a woman to become less feminine in order to be powerful.

This is what I mean when I talk about sacred femininity.

Not a mystical force we worship.

But a God-given expression of strength that we learn to recognize, steward, and surrender back to its Source.


The World Can Wear That Strength Right Out of Us

And perhaps that’s why this matters so much.

Because a woman doesn’t usually wake up one morning and decide to stop being herself.

She gets worn down.

Little by little.

She becomes the one who remembers everything.

The one who handles everything.

The one who keeps the peace.

The one who makes sure everyone else is okay.

She learns that being needed feels good.

She learns that being agreeable keeps things calm.

She learns that saying yes makes her easier to love.

She learns that having boundaries disappoints people.

She learns that her body is something to fix.

Her home is something to compare.

Her marriage is something to perform.

Her motherhood is something to prove.

Her career is something to measure.

Her spirituality is something to display.

And eventually, she may become so skilled at being everything everyone else needs that she no longer knows what she needs.

That’s not empowerment.

That’s depletion.

And sometimes we don’t lose ourselves because we are weak.

We lose ourselves because we have spent ourselves everywhere.

Perhaps that’s why rest matters.

Why solitude matters.

Why boundaries matter.

Why discernment matters.

Why learning to say no matters.

Why being honest about what God has—and has not—asked of us matters.

Because stewardship isn’t just about money.

We are also responsible for what we do with the strength, time, attention, wisdom, creativity, and influence God has entrusted to us.


What If You Don’t Need to Become Someone New?

Maybe you’re not as far from the woman God created you to be as you think.

Maybe she’s still there.

Underneath the exhaustion.

Underneath the expectations.

Underneath the comparison.

Underneath the years of trying to be good enough.

Underneath the things you were taught about what a woman should be.

Underneath the things you learned to tolerate.

Underneath the parts of yourself you silenced because they made someone else uncomfortable.

What if she isn’t gone?

What if she’s simply been covered over?

And what if becoming isn’t always about constructing a new woman?

What if it is sometimes about uncovering the one God already created?

That question changes everything.

Because perhaps the goal isn’t to become more powerful.

Perhaps the goal is to become more fully aligned with the power God already entrusted to you.

Not power over someone.

Power under God.

Power with purpose.

Power that knows when to speak and when to listen.

When to fight and when to walk away.

When to nurture and when to release.

When to build and when to rest.

When to say yes.

And when a holy, healthy, unapologetic no is the most faithful answer you can give.


The Woman Who Knows Who She Is

And this is where something beautiful happens in marriage.

A woman who doesn’t know who she is can easily become an adversary to the man beside her.

Not necessarily because she wants to be.

But because insecurity creates competition.

If she believes his strength diminishes hers, she will eventually feel threatened by his.

If he believes her strength threatens his, he will eventually try to contain hers.

And suddenly two people who were created to work together are measuring themselves against one another.

But a woman who knows who she is doesn’t need to do that.

The woman who knows who she is becomes an ally rather than an adversary to the man beside her.

Not because she disappears into him.

Because she stands beside him fully alive.

She doesn’t need him to become smaller so she can feel powerful.

And she doesn’t need to become smaller so he can feel powerful.

She can celebrate his strength because she knows hers isn’t threatened by it.

And he can celebrate hers because he understands that her strength doesn’t diminish his.

This is where I believe we have sometimes misunderstood biblical complementarity.

It’s not:

“I complete him because he is incomplete.”

And it’s not:

“He completes me because I am incomplete.”

It is something far more beautiful:

Two whole people, surrendered to the same Creator, bringing different strengths to the same calling.

That is not competition.

That’s partnership.

That’s complementarity.

And perhaps that’s what God had in mind from the beginning.


Maybe We’ve Been Reading Proverbs 31 All Wrong

Which brings us to the woman who has intimidated Christian women for generations.

The Proverbs 31 woman.

I’ll admit it.

For years, I could look at that passage and feel tired before I even got to the end.

She’s up early.

She’s buying fields.

She’s making clothing.

She’s conducting business.

She’s providing for her household.

She’s helping the poor.

She’s preparing for the future.

She’s speaking wisdom.

She’s strong.

She’s dignified.

She’s productive.

She’s apparently never misplaced her keys.

Who exactly is this woman? (And why do I feel so insignificant when compared to her??) 

But perhaps those are the wrong questions.

Because Proverbs 31 isn’t asking every woman to reproduce every activity this particular woman undertook.

It is showing us what can happen when a woman fully inhabits the strength and wisdom God has given her.

Look at her.

She is not passive.

She is not waiting for someone else to tell her what she is capable of.

She evaluates.

She decides.

She works.

She creates.

She invests.

She provides.

She speaks.

She teaches.

She prepares.

She gives.

She leads.

And Scripture says:

“She is clothed with strength and dignity.”

Strength.

Dignity.

Not because she has become masculine.

Not because she has rejected dependence on God.

Not because she has proven that she doesn’t need anyone.

Because she is fully alive within the design God gave her.

Maybe the Proverbs 31 woman was never supposed to make us feel inadequate.

Maybe she was supposed to make us curious.

Where is that woman in me?

Where do I already carry her courage?

Her wisdom?

Her creativity?

Her resourcefulness?

Her generosity?

Her discernment?

Her strength?

Where have I been afraid to use those things?

Where have I mistaken them for something un-feminine?

Where have I been taught that being a “good woman” means becoming less visible, less vocal, less capable, or less willing to act?

Maybe she’s not our competition.

Maybe she’s our invitation.


Different Battles. Different Strength.

There is another reason this matters.

Women and men do not experience the world in precisely the same way.

We aren’t fighting every battle on the same playing field.

And I don’t mean that as a limitation.

I mean it as a gift.

A woman doesn’t need to fight like a man to prove that her strength is real.

She doesn’t need his weapons.

She doesn’t need his temperament.

She doesn’t need his way of moving through the world.

She needs to know what God put in her hands.

Because imagine a battle in which half the intended forces are standing on the sidelines because someone convinced them their particular strengths weren’t valuable.

The loss wouldn’t belong only to the women sitting there.

Everyone would feel it.

The marriage would.

The family would.

The children would.

The church would.

The community would.

The next generation would.

When a woman shrinks, something is lost.

And when she rises—not in arrogance, not in rebellion, not in competition, but in alignment with God—something is restored.


The Power of Becoming Fully Woman

Maybe sacred femininity isn’t about becoming more feminine.

Maybe it is about becoming fully yourself as the woman God created you to be.

Not softer because someone told you women should be soft.

Not stronger because someone told you women should be strong.

Not quieter.

Not louder.

Not more submissive.

Not more independent.

Not more successful.

Not more desirable.

More surrendered.

More discerning.

More alive.

More honest.

More rooted.

More courageous.

More willing to use what God has given you.

And perhaps that is the sacred part.

The strength isn’t sacred because it belongs to you.

It’s sacred because it came from Him.

So don’t worship your femininity.

But don’t apologize for it either.

Don’t allow the world to define it for you.

And don’t allow anyone else to convince you that being powerful makes you less feminine.

A woman can be powerful and tender.

Wise and nurturing.

Capable and receptive.

Courageous and compassionate.

Sexual and dignified.

Independent in thought and deeply connected in relationship.

She can lead.

She can follow.

She can build.

She can nurture.

She can fight.

She can rest.

She can speak.

She can listen.

She can stand beside a strong man without competing with him.

And she can love him without disappearing into him.

Because she knows something that changes everything:

She knows who she is.

And she knows whose she is.

Perhaps that is where sacred femininity begins.

Not in becoming something the world has told you to become.

But in remembering what God created when He made you woman.

And then having the courage to become fully, faithfully, unapologetically her.

Because God didn’t make you powerful by accident.

He made you that way on purpose.

Until Next Week— Keep Becoming! 

When Leadership Becomes Authority: What Did God Actually Ask of a Wife?

There is a beautiful biblical principle that can become something very different when we turn it into a rule.

A husband is called to lead.

A wife is called to submit.

A wife is described as a “helper.”

Those ideas appear in Scripture. But somewhere along the way, many of us were handed a version of them that sounded a lot more like this:

He’s the man. You’re supposed to follow him.

And if he makes the decision, you go along.

If he is wrong, you pray.

If he is irresponsible, you endure.

If he is angry, you keep the peace.

If he makes a decision you believe is unwise, you submit anyway.

If something is morally wrong, well…

He’s your husband. What choice do you have?

 

That last sentence is where I want us to slow down.

Because there is a difference between biblical submission and passive obedience.

 

Sadly, in my years of working with women, I have come to realize that a vast majority of Christian women do not truly understand that submission and passivity are NOT the same thing! 

So after considerable prayer, BTBAB is being led to train women to discern between the two.

This post will probably create some mixed feelings. That’s okay! 

We have to realize that “feelings” aren’t supposed to be the basis for our actions. And long held family, social and church traditions shouldn’t be either!

Please don’t be quick to take offense. Stay with me… and let’s explore this, step by step, using biblical examples are our guide. 

First up in the concept that: 

Passive obedience isn’t biblical maturity.

There is a kind of obedience that looks spiritual on the outside but can actually become a way of avoiding responsibility.

“He’s my husband. I have no choice.”

It can sound humble.

It can sound submissive.

It can even sound deeply Christian.

But sometimes it is simply a way of handing responsibility to someone else.

And Scripture doesn’t give us permission to do that.

A woman doesn’t stop being a moral agent because she gets married.

She doesn’t stop bearing the image of God.

She doesn’t stop having a conscience.

She doesn’t stop being responsible for what she participates in, what she teaches her children, what she supports, what she permits, or what she calls right and wrong.

Her husband’s leadership does not become her conscience.

She answers to God, too.

That matters enormously when a marriage is healthy.

And it matters even more when it isn’t.

Because if we’ve taught women that “submission” means surrendering their discernment, we have created a theological framework in which a woman can be convinced that obedience to her husband requires disobedience to her own conscience.

That isn’t a small misunderstanding.

That’s a dangerous one.


Maybe “helpmate” doesn’t mean what we think it means

Genesis 2:18 says:

“I will make a helper suitable for him.”

The Hebrew phrase is ʿezer kənegdô.

And here’s where things get interesting.

Ezer can be translated “helper,” but that English word can carry an implication of subordinate assistance that isn’t inherent in the Hebrew term. In the Old Testament, ezer is also used of God as the helper of His people.

Kənegdô conveys the idea of something corresponding to him, suitable for him, or facing him.

There is legitimate scholarly discussion about exactly how the phrase should be rendered. But what it does not give us is a simple picture of a woman created to be a lesser person standing behind a superior one.

She is his corresponding counterpart.

His partner.

The one standing beside him.

And that becomes especially interesting when we look at the women Scripture actually gives us.

Because the Bible does not present women as a collection of quiet, passive observers waiting for men to tell them what to do.


Look at the women Scripture remembers

Consider Deborah.

She was a judge of Israel. People came to her for judgment, and she summoned Barak and instructed him concerning Israel’s military action (Judges 4).

Consider Abigail.

Her husband Nabal behaved foolishly and put their entire household in danger. Abigail recognized what was happening, acted decisively, approached David, appealed to his conscience, and prevented bloodshed (1 Samuel 25).

She didn’t wait for her husband to authorize her wisdom.

Consider Huldah.

When the Book of the Law was discovered during Josiah’s reign, royal representatives went to her for interpretation. Her words carried enough authority that the king’s officials took her message seriously (2 Kings 22).

Consider Esther.

She risked approaching the king because she recognized that silence could cost her people their lives.

Consider Jael.

Judges 4 tells us that Sisera, commander of an enemy army, fled to her tent. Jael acted decisively and killed him with a tent peg. Judges 5 later celebrates her action.

Consider the unnamed woman of Abel Beth Maacah in 2 Samuel 20.

This one may be my favorite for what we’re talking about.

Joab and David’s forces were preparing to destroy her city because Sheba, a rebel against David, had taken refuge there.

This woman came out and called to Joab.

She demanded to know why a city that was described as a peaceful and faithful city should be destroyed.

She learned that Joab wanted Sheba.

Then she went to the people of the city, persuaded them to act, and Sheba’s head was thrown over the wall.

The army withdrew.

The city was spared.

And Scripture doesn’t introduce her as a queen, prophet, judge, military commander, or wife of an important man.

It simply calls her a wise woman.

She saw a problem.

She spoke.

She questioned a man with military power.

She negotiated.

She persuaded her community.

And she helped save her city.

That’s a remarkable picture of what biblical womanhood can look like.

And then there’s another unnamed woman in Judges 9.

When Abimelech attacked Thebez, a woman dropped an upper millstone on him from the tower. He was mortally wounded, and his dying concern was that no one would say a woman had killed him.

The Bible is not giving us a handbook instructing women to throw rocks at men.

Obviously.

But these stories matter because they make one thing very difficult to argue:

Biblical women are not consistently portrayed as passive, voiceless, or incapable of decisive action.

The Scriptures contain women who discern.

Women who speak.

Women who confront.

Women who persuade.

Women who protect.

Women who lead.

Women who act.

Sometimes their actions occur precisely when the men around them are failing to see what needs to be seen.

That doesn’t erase the biblical distinctions between men and women.

But it should make us very cautious about turning “submission” into passivity.


So what has God entrusted to BOTH of them?

This is the question I think we sometimes skip.

We talk about what God entrusted to a husband.

Leadership.

Responsibility.

Protection.

Sacrificial love.

Provision.

Spiritual responsibility.

And those things matter.

But what has God entrusted to the wife?

Discernment.

Wisdom.

Conscience.

Influence.

Strength.

Responsibility.

Motherhood, for those who have children.

Spiritual formation.

The stewardship of her own choices.

And ultimately, accountability before God.

Marriage doesn’t erase those things.

A husband may lead the household, but he doesn’t become the woman’s conscience.

His leadership does not cancel hers.

And her husband’s responsibility does not become an excuse for her to stop exercising her own.

This is why I think the phrase co-laborer is sometimes more helpful than the mental picture many women have been given.

Not because husband and wife have to be identical.

Not because every decision must become a 50/50 vote.

Not because biblical marriage means nobody ever follows anyone.

But because both people are responsible participants in the life God has entrusted to them.

She was not created to be his shadow.

She was created to stand beside him.


When did leadership become unquestionable authority?

This is where things get messy.

Because Scripture does speak about husbands loving, serving, protecting, and leading.

Ephesians 5 is one of the passages most often brought into this conversation.

But notice what Paul actually says to husbands.

He doesn’t say:

You are the boss. Make sure she knows it.

He tells husbands to love their wives as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her (Ephesians 5:25).

That’s a very different picture of leadership than entitlement.

Christlike leadership is not a blank check for authority.

It is a call to sacrificial responsibility.

And Ephesians 5 begins with a statement that matters enormously to the conversation: “submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ” (Ephesians 5:21).

The relationship between that verse and the household instructions that follow is debated among scholars, including questions about the grammar and textual form of verse 22. There is legitimate disagreement about exactly how the passage should be structured and translated.

But there is no good reason to pretend the passage is simple.

The first-century household existed inside a very different social world than ours. The household instructions in Ephesians interact with that world while also placing substantial demands upon husbands.

So instead of grabbing one verse and building an entire theology of marriage around it, we should read the whole passage.

And perhaps ask a better question:

What kind of leadership is Paul actually describing?

Because if the model is Christ, then leadership cannot simply mean getting your way.

It means laying yourself down.

It means taking responsibility.

It means loving sacrificially.

It means using strength for the good of another person rather than using another person for the benefit of yourself.

That’s leadership.

And that’s a very different thing from unquestionable authority.


Submission is not the same thing as agreement

This distinction matters.

A wife can honor her husband without agreeing with him.

She can respect him without believing every decision he makes is wise.

She can submit in a particular area without surrendering her ability to think.

She can disagree without being rebellious.

She can say no without dishonoring him.

And she can refuse to participate in something she believes is wrong without becoming a “disrespectful wife.”

Because respect is not silence.

Submission is not agreement.

Leadership is not infallibility.

A boundary is not rebellion.

Those distinctions become especially important when the husband is making decisions that are not merely different from hers, but destructive.

What if he’s addicted to pornography?

What if he’s abusing alcohol?

What if gambling is destroying the family’s finances?

What if gaming has consumed his life to the point that his wife and children are neglected?

What if he’s having an affair?

What if he’s controlling?

What if he’s threatening?

What if he’s physically violent?

What if he is demanding that she participate in deception?

What if he is making choices that place their children in danger?

Is a wife supposed to say:

“Well, he’s the head of the household, so I have to support him”?

No.

That isn’t biblical submission.

That’s passive obedience.

And passive obedience can become a very convenient way to avoid responsibility.


A wife is not her husband’s moral shield

A woman does not become righteous by participating in her husband’s unrighteousness.

She doesn’t become more godly by helping him conceal it.

She isn’t required to lie for him.

She isn’t required to protect his reputation at the expense of truth.

She isn’t required to teach her children that destructive behavior is acceptable because “Daddy is the head of the house.”

And she certainly isn’t required to surrender her conscience because someone told her that doing otherwise would make her a rebellious wife.

Being your husband’s helpmate does not make you his accomplice.

A wife is not her husband’s moral shield.

And a husband’s leadership cannot absolve a wife of her own responsibility to discern whether the direction of their household is righteous.

Sometimes loving your husband means supporting him.

Sometimes it means encouraging him.

Sometimes it means following his lead.

And sometimes it means looking directly at him and saying:

“No. I cannot participate in this.”

That isn’t automatically rebellion.

Sometimes it is wisdom.

Sometimes it is courage.

Sometimes it is the most faithful thing a woman can do.


And then there’s the New Testament

The picture doesn’t suddenly become simpler once we get to Paul.

Romans 16 names women such as Phoebe, Prisca, and Junia in significant ways, and Paul’s letters refer to women as coworkers and people serving important roles within Christian communities.

Exactly how every title should be translated or understood is debated, particularly in the case of Junia and several terms associated with Phoebe. Modern scholarship continues to examine those questions rather than treating every English rendering as self-evident.

That matters.

Because translation is interpretation.

That doesn’t mean translations are deliberately corrupt.

It means moving words from Hebrew or Greek into English requires choices.

And English words come with baggage.

A word that sounds like “assistant” to a modern reader may not carry the same implications as the ancient term behind it.

A word translated “submit” can be understood within a larger sentence, argument, culture, and relationship.

And sometimes the assumptions of the reader become so familiar that we stop noticing them.

That’s where we need to be careful.


Some of our ideas about women may be older than we realize

Some of the most limiting ideas about women have been repeated so faithfully within Christian culture that many women have mistaken them for Scripture itself.

That is worth examining.

Not because Christianity needs to be reinvented every time society changes.

Not because modern culture gets the final word.

Not because every traditional interpretation is automatically wrong.

And certainly not because women should simply do whatever feels good.

Quite the opposite.

If we believe Scripture is authoritative, then we should be willing to examine what we’ve been taught against Scripture itself.

We should be willing to ask whether a particular teaching comes from the text—or from a tradition built around the text.

We should be willing to distinguish between:

What Scripture actually says

and

what we’ve always heard Scripture says.

Those aren’t necessarily the same thing.


So go back to Scripture

This is not an invitation to replace one authority with another.

Please don’t trade the church lady who told you what the Bible means for the internet personality who tells you what the Bible really means.

Don’t trade one guru for another.

And don’t throw Scripture away because somebody used it badly.

Open the Bible.

Not take my word for it.

Not replace one internet guru with another.

Not do whatever feels good.

Read it.

Read Genesis.

Read the stories.

Read the Gospels.

Read Acts.

Read Romans 16.

Read Ephesians 5 in context.

Read the difficult passages.

Read the uncomfortable ones.

Look at the women Scripture remembers.

Ask what the original words meant.

Ask what the surrounding culture assumed.

Ask what the text actually says.

And then ask the uncomfortable question:

Is what I was taught actually what Scripture says—or is it what generations of people have told me Scripture says?

That’s not rebellion.

That’s discernment.

And discernment is not something a woman has to surrender when she gets married.

She already bears the image of God.

She already has a conscience.

She already has responsibility before Him.

Marriage doesn’t transfer those things to her husband.

She answers to God, too.

So yes, there may be times when a wife follows her husband’s lead.

There may be times when she defers to his judgment.

There may be times when honoring him means laying down her own preference.

That’s part of loving another human being.

But there is a world of difference between choosing to yield and believing you have no choice.

One is an act of love.

The other can become passive obedience.

And a woman does not need to make herself smaller, quieter, weaker, or less discerning in order to become a godly wife.

She was created to stand beside him.

To help.

To speak.

To discern.

To encourage.

To challenge.

To love.

To serve.

To exercise wisdom.

And when necessary—

to say, “This is not right.”

Dear Ones, sometimes the most faithful thing a Godly woman can do is refuse to surrender the discernment He gave her.

I will leave you with a bit of homework this week: Read the verses I’ve provided. Ask for the Creator to show you areas where you have fallen subject to traditions that don’t quite line up with His original intent for Biblical Womanhood. You may be surprised at what He shows you. 


I pray peace and wisdom rain down upon you as you discern God’s perfect will for your current situation. 
Until Next Week—- 

 

When We Betray Ourselves: What happens when keeping the peace means abandoning yourself

There is a particular kind of heartbreak that is difficult to recognize while you are living it.

It doesn’t always look like betrayal.

Sometimes it looks like compromise.

Sometimes it looks like being patient.

Sometimes it looks like loving someone enough to make sacrifices.

Sometimes it looks like keeping the peace.

And sometimes it looks like slowly abandoning pieces of yourself because you’re afraid of what might happen if you don’t.

Until one day, you look around at the life you’re living and realize:

I didn’t just tolerate something. I participated in my own disappearance.

That’s a hard thing to admit.

But sometimes the truth needs to sting.

My grandmother used to call that an iodine and alcohol bath.

You know the kind.

You fall off your bicycle. You scrape your knee. There’s gravel and dirt ground into the wound.

And then comes the part where somebody who loves you pours something on it that makes you wonder whether losing the entire leg might actually be preferable.

It hurts.

But the purpose isn’t to punish you for falling off the bicycle.

The purpose is to clean the wound.

And sometimes that’s what honest self-examination does.

It stings.

But it cleans.


The Part We Don’t Want to Look At

Let’s get something straight before we go any further:

What someone else did to you belongs to them. (Yes, they could have been kinder. Gentlier. More faithful. More supportive. More considerate. I’m not excusing their bad behaviors.)

But what you choose to do with what happened belongs to you!

And that’s where this conversation gets uncomfortable. 

Because we can spend a tremendous amount of time asking:

Why did they do that?

Why didn’t they treat me better?

Why didn’t they love me the way I loved them?

Why did they take advantage of me?

Those are legitimate questions.

But eventually, another question has to enter the room:

What did I do?

Not what did they do.

What did I do?

What did I tolerate?

What did I repeatedly excuse?

What did I know but refuse to acknowledge?

Where did I say yes when I meant no?

Where did I abandon something important to myself because I was afraid of what I might lose?

And perhaps the hardest question of all:

What have my choices produced?

That’s not blame.

That’s accountability.

And accountability is where things can finally begin to change.


Personal Responsibility Is Painful

We don’t like to admit we made a bad choice.

We’d much rather explain it.

We were afraid.

We were young.

We didn’t know.

They pressured us.

We were trying to keep the peace.

We were trying to make the relationship work.

We were trying to be a good Christian.

We were trying to be loving.

And sometimes those explanations are completely legitimate.

But an explanation doesn’t erase a consequence.

And understanding why you made a choice doesn’t mean you have to pretend it was a good one.

Sometimes the most liberating sentence we can say is:

“I screwed up.”

I made a terrible choice.

I ignored what I knew.

I stayed too long.

I gave away too much.

I kept saying yes.

I kept going back.

I kept making excuses.

I kept hoping something would change while continuing to participate in the very pattern that was making me miserable.

That’s painful.

But there is something incredibly powerful about being able to say it.

Because once I can admit I made this choice, I can also begin to say:

I can make a different one.

That’s the part I don’t want us to miss.

Personal responsibility isn’t another brick to strap onto your back.

It’s the moment you realize you have your hands on the reins.


Look at the Wagon

Picture your life as a wagon.

You’re sitting in it, and the wagon is moving.

Maybe it’s moving toward peace.

Maybe toward health.

Maybe toward purpose.

Or maybe you’re sitting there wondering how in the world you wound up somewhere you never intended to go.

You’re frustrated.

You’re exhausted.

You’re looking around thinking:

How did I get here?

So you start looking for somebody to blame.

Maybe somebody pushed the wagon.

Maybe somebody hurt you.

Maybe somebody made a terrible decision that affected your life.

Maybe they absolutely did.

But eventually you have to look toward the front of the wagon.

Because there are horses pulling it.

And those horses have names.

There’s People Pleasing.

There’s Fear of Rejection.

There’s Avoiding Conflict.

There’s I Don’t Want to Be Alone.

There’s Everybody Else’s Needs Come First.

There’s I’ll Deal With It Later.

And then there’s that particularly stubborn horse:

But They Did It First.

Maybe you’ve been feeding these horses for years.

And every time you make another choice that reinforces the pattern, you hitch them a little tighter to the wagon.

Then one day you look around and realize:

These horses have been pulling me in the same direction for a very long time.

That’s when things get interesting.

Because you can sit in that wagon and complain about where you’re going.

You can spend years explaining why the horses behave the way they do.

Or you can finally reach forward…

and grab the reins.


Our Choices Create Precedents

This is the part of personal responsibility that I think we desperately need to understand.

Our repeated choices become patterns.

Our patterns create precedents.

And eventually, those precedents can become the life we are living.

Every time you override your own boundary, you’re teaching yourself something.

Every time you say yes when you mean no, you’re teaching yourself something.

Every time you silence your discomfort to keep somebody else comfortable, you’re teaching yourself something.

Every time you abandon a dream to keep somebody happy, you’re teaching yourself something.

Every time you accept disrespect because you’re afraid of what will happen if you don’t, you’re teaching yourself something.

You’re establishing a precedent.

This is what I tolerate.

This is what I sacrifice.

This is what I don’t talk about.

This is what I do when I’m afraid.

And eventually, you may not even recognize the behavior as a choice anymore.

You’ve practiced it so often that it feels automatic.

That’s how we wind up living lives we never consciously chose.

Not because we had no choices.

Because we made enough small choices in the same direction that eventually the direction felt inevitable.

It isn’t inevitable.

But it is ours to change!


The Stories We Tell Ourselves

Here’s where things get really interesting.

We’re very good at creating stories that make our choices feel reasonable.

I stayed because I loved him.

I kept quiet because I didn’t want conflict.

I gave up that opportunity because the timing wasn’t right.

I kept forgiving because that’s what good Christians do.

I didn’t speak up because I didn’t want to hurt anyone.

Maybe.

But what if there was something else underneath the story?

I stayed because I was afraid.

I kept quiet because I was terrified of what would happen if I told the truth.

I gave up the opportunity because choosing myself felt selfish.

I kept forgiving because I didn’t know how to admit I needed something to change.

I didn’t speak up because I was afraid my needs would make me less lovable.

Sometimes what we’re calling love is actually fear wearing love’s clothes.

And sometimes what we’re calling patience is really fear of making a decision.

Sometimes what we’re calling humility is really our inability to believe we’re allowed to have needs.

Sometimes what we’re calling forgiveness is simply our refusal to confront a pattern.

Again—this isn’t about beating ourselves up.

It’s about telling ourselves the truth.

Because a pattern doesn’t become healthy simply because we’ve gotten really good at explaining it.


What Are You Getting in Return?

Here’s another question worth asking:

What am I getting from continuing to make this choice?

We all make relational transactions.

We give love.

We give time.

We give forgiveness.

We give patience.

We sacrifice.

That’s part of being human.

But sometimes there’s a hidden transaction underneath all of that.

I’ll give up this if you’ll stay.

I’ll keep quiet if you’ll love me.

I’ll make myself smaller if you’ll choose me.

I’ll keep everybody happy if nobody gets angry.

I’ll surrender this dream if I don’t have to be alone.

And now we’re not simply giving.

We’re trading.

We’re giving away pieces of ourselves in exchange for something we desperately want.

Safety.

Belonging.

Approval.

Being needed.

Being chosen.

Relief from loneliness.

And if what we’re getting feels worth the price, we keep paying.

Until eventually the price becomes so high that we can no longer ignore it.

That’s often when the pain becomes impossible to explain away.

And sometimes that pain is exactly what finally wakes us up.


Selflessness Is Not Self-Abandonment

This matters, especially for women of faith.

We are called to love.

We’re called to serve.

We’re called to forgive.

We’re called to sacrifice.

But selflessness and self-abandonment are not the same thing.

Sacrifice says:

“I freely give something of myself because love calls me to.”

Self-betrayal says:

“I surrender something essential about myself because I’m afraid of what I’ll lose if I don’t.”

Those things can look remarkably similar from the outside.

But they’re very different on the inside.

One is freely given.

The other is fear making the decision.

God did not create you so that you could spend your life disappearing in order to keep somebody else comfortable.

And if you’ve been doing that, the answer isn’t to hate yourself for it.

The answer is to wake up.

Look at the choices.

Look at the pattern.

Look at where those choices have taken you.

And then decide what you’re going to do differently.


This Is Where Becoming Begins

There is a beautiful difference between condemnation and conviction.

Condemnation says:

“Look what you’ve done.”

Conviction says:

“Look.”

Look at the pattern.

Look at the choice.

Look at the consequence.

Look at the story you’ve been writing.

And now—

choose.

That’s the turning point.

Because recognition isn’t the destination.

It’s the doorway.

You don’t have to spend the rest of your life punishing yourself for choices you made when you didn’t know what you know now.

But neither do you need to protect yourself from the painful truth that some of those choices were bad ones.

Own them.

Learn from them.

Change them.

That’s growth.

And that’s where becoming gets really exciting.

Because personal responsibility means the direction of your life isn’t entirely in somebody else’s hands.

You get to have a role in what happens next.


Grab the Reins

You may not be able to change the past.

You may not be able to change another person.

You may not be able to change the circumstances you’re standing in today.

But you can change your participation.

You can stop feeding the horse called People Pleasing.

You can stop letting Fear of Rejection decide where the wagon goes.

You can stop allowing Avoiding Conflict to determine what you’re willing to tolerate.

You can stop hitching your future to I Don’t Want to Be Alone.

You can stop using Everybody Else’s Needs Come First as an excuse to abandon your own.

And you can finally retire that old excuse:

But They Did It First.

Maybe they did.

But they’re not holding your reins.

You are.

And that is very, very good news.

Because when you take responsibility for your choices, you gain the ability to make new ones.

And new choices create new patterns.

New patterns create new precedents.

And new precedents can create a very different life.


You Don’t Have to Keep Going That Way

Maybe you’re looking at your life right now and realizing you’ve been heading in a direction you don’t want to go.

Don’t waste that realization.

Yes, it may hurt.

Let it hurt.

Let the iodine sting.

Let yourself admit the things you’ve been unwilling to admit.

I made a bad choice.

I ignored the warning signs.

I kept choosing what was familiar over what was healthy.

I tolerated something because I was afraid of what would happen if I didn’t.

I participated in a pattern that is making my life miserable.

Those aren’t sentences of defeat.

They’re sentences of awakening.

Because now you know.

And knowing changes what is possible.

You can stop the wagon.

You can turn it around.

You can choose a different road.

You can learn new ways of responding.

You can establish new boundaries.

You can make different decisions.

You can become different.

Not because you were worthless before.

Because you’re finally willing to take the reins.


So What Story Are You Writing Now?

Maybe it helps to look at the whole thing like this:

What happened → What I did → What I learned → What I believed → What I repeated → What it produced → What I can now choose.

Look at that last part.

What I can now choose.

That’s the gift hidden inside accountability.

You don’t have to pretend you didn’t make the choices.

You don’t have to minimize their consequences.

You don’t have to dress them up in prettier language.

And you don’t have to stay trapped inside them forever.

You can look honestly at where you’ve been.

You can acknowledge the part you played.

You can grieve what those choices cost you.

And then—

you can grab the reins.

Maybe the life you’ve been living has been shaped by choices you wish you’d made differently.

Okay.

Now you know.

And knowing means you get to make the next choice differently.

So, girl…

Look at the wagon.

Look at those horses.

Look at where they’ve taken you.

And now—

grab the reins.

Because you don’t have to keep going that way. 

That’s not another brick on your back.

That’s handing you a pen— and giving yourself the authority to change the direction of your life story! 

Until Next Time,